data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08276/082767219402bc43dfed747840d36ed59eeaa348" alt=""
So it's down to us six. Six people from different walks of life, who now must render verdicts based on what we heard, what we saw, and - yes - what we bring to the table in terms of experience and bias. It comes down to direct evidence, circumstantial evidence, and a lot of "he said/he said/he said." All can be considered, according to our judge.
As far as I'm concerned, this cannot be rushed. We have 17 pages of questions from the judge. One question per page. We cannot move on until 5 of the 6 jurors have come to a consensus. One dissenter is allowed, but we all have to sign off on each question. Our yeas and nays will be sent to the judge to formulate the verdict. But each question must be considered.
Alas, we have three members of the jury who just want to be done with it. Truth be told, I just want to be done with it, too. But this is no time to rush to judgment, just to get out of the jury room. Real people's lives will be affected, whichever way we go. All sides will feel the impact. All sides - 1 plaintiff, 2 defendants - gave compelling testimony and evidence. All sides gave lousy or questionable testimony and evidence. It will take time to sort out what's what as we go question by question. Every element of the case has been teased out to force us to consider all the action in question. This cannot be rushed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c1ea/7c1eaa54d43f2e375da1b1abb9598e080815817b" alt=""
I'm not looking forward to today. There will be some wrangling, believe you me. The truth is that I, too, hope we finish this afternoon. It's hard being on a jury during the day and catching up with my work at night and weekends. I'm tired. But this part of the process is called "deliberation," not "let's just check off on these questions and get home." It's about logic, reasoning, and thoughtfulness. And lives will be changed by our decisions.
3 comments:
I'd certainly want you, and 11 like you, in my jury, Mary.
(Not that I'm planning anything, you understand...)
You know -- if the world was comprised of "two kinds of people," one kind good and the other bad; one kind right and the other wrong; one kind just and the other un -- we would have no need for courtrooms, judges or juries. If that were so all questions, like you question number 1, would be easily answered. It's question 5 and beyond that require deliberation.
Let 'em swing.
Post a Comment